The new version updates its principles of good practice in the foreign exchange market in two key areas. Alongside the revised code, GFXC stated that it will also publish enhanced Disclosure Cover Sheets (DCS) for liquidity providers and platforms.

The code was updated following an extensive consultation process with local FX committees (LFXCs) globally as well as a wide range of market participants through a public request for feedback in October 2024.  

At the time, however, the Foreign Exchange Professionals Association (FXPA) labelled the updates “well-intentioned but flawed”, namely due to the overly complicated language used in the proposals and the lack of practical detail. 

Read more: FX association calls out proposed FX Global Code revisions for ‘complexity and lack of clarity’ 

Following the consultation process, updates have been made to five of the code’s 55 principles to strengthen guidance around FX settlement risk and increase transparency around certain FX transactions and the use of client data on electronic trading platforms. 

Elsewhere, the DCS for liquidity providers and platforms were also extended, aiming to improve transparency and comparability across providers on the use of FX data.  

“We welcome the code’s continued emphasis on mitigating FX settlement risk via PvP [payment vs payment] mechanisms and automated netting solutions, using the ‘risk waterfall’ concept as a best practice approach,” said Marc Bayle de Jessé, chief executive at CLS.  

“The principles outlined in the code are critical for reducing systemic risk while enhancing resilience and efficiency in the global FX market.” 

As part of the updated FX Global Code, it becomes essential for trading platforms to disclose how they use data from client transactions, especially with respect to order handling, fees, and post-trade reviews. 

Elsewhere, there has been an establishment of a “hierarchy of settlement methods” and a risk waterfall approach, to tackle settlement risk.  

“The updates to the global FX code are a significant step forward in enhancing transparency and reducing risk in FX markets. It is now incumbent upon firms to use the next 12 months to implement the available solutions to facilitate PvP settlement,” said Alex Knight, head of EMEA at Baton Systems.   

“Even where PvP settlements aren’t yet available, most firms still have an opportunity to deploy technology to further de-risk their business through the use of real-time information to track and orchestrate settlements in a controlled manner, and to reduce the volume of business that is settled gross.” 

Firms have been given a “sufficient” 12-month period by the GFXC to comply with these changes, which have been created with the aim of improving transparency, efficiency, and risk mitigation in FX markets. 

Following the code review, GFXC chair, Gerardo García, commented “there has been strong GFXC support for the final proposals of the FX settlement risk and FX data working groups.  

“The code amendments clearly address the concerns that market participants and LFXCs expressed during the review process and are consistent with the objective of having a more robust and transparent FX market.”  

Basu Choudhury, head of trade lifecycle strategy at OSTTRA, highlighted that the updated FX Global Code “rightly prioritises” the mitigation of settlement risk and liquidity –which he noted as pressing challenges within the FX market.  

“We see this as a pivotal moment to ensure market participants not only manage settlement risk but also optimise their FX liquidity comprehensively,” he said. 

“Only by integrating tools to facilitate full visibility of exposures from point of execution with effective netting protocols and intraday FX PvP can firms be empowered to navigate future FX settlement challenges with greater confidence and precision.” 

The post FX Global Code revisions get green light from participants appeared first on The TRADE.

The FX Global Code are a set of industry guidelines aimed at keeping global currency markets fair and transparent.

The Global Foreign Exchange Committee (GFXC), responsible for maintaining standards in the global FX market, has proposed changes to its FX Global Code, which was established to provide guidance on how currency trades are carried out globally, with the goal of encouraging integrity and transparency.

This marks the second iteration of the GFXC’s global FX code in the form of a public consultation, six years on from its inception.

Read more: Key updates to the FX global code to be revealed in October

The FXPA highlighted these updates as being well-intentioned but flawed, namely due to the overly complicated language used in the proposals and the lack of practical detail.

The industry group argues that the GFXC didn’t provide enough background to explain why each rule change is necessary. In addition, the group noted that the 16-day feedback window was tight, given the global and highly regulated nature of the FX market, with participants operating under various regional rules.

Among the proposed rule changes, firms have been encouraged to reduce settlement risk by using a one-size-fits-all method called a “risk waterfall,” which prioritises payment-versus-payment (PVP) settlements.

The FXPA highlights that despite this approach potentially being safer, it may not work in cases where trades happen within a single institution, like a bank settling transactions between its own clients. The association argues that in such situations, PVP could actually increase risk and add unnecessary complexity.

“The GFXC’s suggested updates to principle 35 to use PvP processes where practicable is not prescriptive enough. With vague definitions, every firm will choose to apply its own definition of where PvP mechanism are practicable, leaving settlement risk on the table,” said Alex Knight, head of EMEA at Baton Systems. 

“As we have seen in recent years, there is ample evidence of technologies in deployment right now that facilitate riskless settlement and netting, eliminating many situations where PvP is not possible.”

Basu Choudhury, head of partnerships and strategic initiatives at OSTTRA, agreed that PvP is the preferred method for mitigating FX settlement risk.

“By far the largest proportion of FX trading is conducted with the primary dealers (bank and non-bank), for whom the ‘on-us settlement’ model may not be feasible, and all parties in the chain (non-bank LPs, FX dealer, asset managers and custodians) must deal with and manage settlement risk,” said Choudhury.

“Access and integration to flexible PvP models would enable the asset managers to execute across a larger pool of dealers as daily settlement limits (DSL) could be increased, leading to more efficient execution opportunities.”

Elsewhere, the GFXC has proposed that it wants FX platforms to disclose more information about “client interaction data”. In response, the FXPA argues that the new language is broad, covering too many types of information and leaving room for confusion.

The association also noted that without clear definitions, the rules can be interpreted by participants differently, creating inconsistencies and additional compliance challenges.

The proposed updates would require that all FX trades be governed by a written agreement, with this extending to include minor and/or informal interactions.

The FXPA highlighted that from a practical sense, this could make routine trading much more complicated and slow down transactions reliant on fast communication, such as messaging apps.

The GFXC also proposed changes around how Standard Settlement Instructions (SSIs) are used. The revised rule would discourage the use of multiple SSIs for the same counterparty unless absolutely necessary, with the goal of reducing settlement errors.

Although the FXPA agrees with the sentiment that minimising SSI variations would have benefits, they urge more flexibility in cases where alternate SSIs may be operationally necessary. The associations warns that strict rules on SSIs could make settlements cumbersome without substantial gains in safety or transparency.

The post FX association calls out proposed FX Global Code revisions for ‘complexity and lack of clarity’ appeared first on The TRADE.